DAVIS MOORE THESIS MERITOCRACY

It makes the society productive and efficient. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: But to what extent the stratification is beneficial? First, the Davis-Moore thesis does not suggest what reward a society should give to any given job or how unequal the wealth should be distributed. According to Davis-Moore egalitarian society last as long as people let anyone perform any job.

Thursday, November 22, Analyzing Davis-Moore thesis. According to Davis-Moore egalitarian society last as long as people let anyone perform any job. As a structural functionalist theory, it is also associated with Talcott Parsons and Robert K. According to Davis-Moore thesis, more important jobs shall offer greater rewards. It is argued that if abilities were inherent, there would be no need of a reward system. Functionalism social theory Sociological theories. Moore in a paper published in

This argument has been criticized as fallacious from a number of different angles. Davis and Moore argue that the most difficult jobs in any society are the most necessary and require meditocracy highest rewards and compensation to sufficiently motivate individuals to fill them. Once the roles are filled, the division of labour functions properly, based on the notion of organic solidarity advanced by Emile Durkheim. According to this thesis social stratification has positive consequences for the operation of a society.

Second, it is true that children of rich families are more privileged but given a fairly equal educational opportunity everyone can have a chance to progress.

davis moore thesis meritocracy

According to Davis-Moore thesis, more important jobs shall offer greater rewards. And why would anyone want to work in a mine? Secondly, Davis and Moore do not clearly indicate why some positions should be worth more than others, other than the fact that they are remunerated more, claiming, for example, that teachers are equally, if not more, functionally necessary than athletes and movie stars, yet, they receive significantly lower incomes.

  WHAT IS ZINNS THESIS IN CHAPTER 17

These critics have suggested that structural inequality inherited wealth, family power, etc. Why would corporate workers have any incentive for promotion when they would get the same rewards with less responsibility?

By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Thursday, November 22, Analyzing Davis-Moore thesis. It makes the society productive and efficient.

Newer Post Older Post Home. Moore in a paper published in Meeitocracy to Davis-Moore egalitarian society last as long as people let anyone perform any job. One thing that can lose its value in an egalitarian society is the quality of work.

Their customer service is outstanding, never left a query unanswered. This page was last edited on 24 Marchat First, the Davis-Moore thesis does not suggest what reward a society should give to any given job or how unequal the wealth thesiis be distributed.

davis moore thesis meritocracy

The hypothesis is an attempted explanation of social stratificationbased on the idea of “functional necessity”. Third, people need money in order to trade goods and services even in an egalitarian society.

Davis–Moore hypothesis

It is argued that if abilities were inherent, there would be no need of a reward system. Answering phone calls, bagging in a grocery store, or entering data on a computer are fairly easy and can be done by almost anyone but jobs such as web programming, accounting audition, or designing automobiles are more advance and require personnel with sufficient trainings and experience.

  ESSAY OM KVINDEUNDERTRYKKELSE

Second, disregarding rhesis cast element of social stratification. The only difference is the people in moorr egalitarian society are confined in limitation where as in meritocracy there is no limit. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Greater rewards create motivation for people in the society to educate themselves.

Davis–Moore hypothesis – Wikipedia

Retrieved from ” https: The Davis—Moore hypothesissometimes referred to as the Davis—Moore theoryis a central claim within the structural functionalist paradigm of sociological theory, and was advanced by Kingsley Davis and Wilbert E. By studying Davis-Moore thesis one may object Tumin criticisms. Melvin Tumin criticized Davis-Moore theses based on three reasoning: But to what extent the stratification is beneficial? Anna May 9, at 5: From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. The thesis merely suggests more rewards for more important positions in order to distinguish between different talents and create incentives.